Saturday, February 29, 2020

Animal Farm Essay Propaganda Example For Students | Artscolumbia

Animal Farm Essay Propaganda George Orwell was a great writer; he created a book with many different qualities. Animal Farm is an allegory, fable, and a satire. He made the characters in the novel relate to real people and events in history. Examples such allegory would be Animalism compared with Communism, Snowball compared with Leon Trotsky, and Napoleon compared to Joseph Stalin. Animalism in many ways does symbolize Communism. Animalism for the animals would be a perfect land, no rich, no poor, and everyone is equal. They all would own the same amount of the farm. No animal would be above any other animal. As in a communistic society, they would all work the same and receive the same. The government would own everything and they people would own the government. In both Animalism and Communism, their goal was a society in which the workers, not the capitalists, owned all the means of production. To reach this ideal situation, a transition period was needed, during which the government controlled the economy. The government guaranteed hospitalization, education, housing, and pension plans, as well as jobs. In Animal Farm, the animals did receive some of those features while Snowball was with them. The people, as well as animals, in turn, gave up every indication of freedom. Thus, everyone would share equally in the benefits of production, and everyone would have an equal share in the goods that were produced. The government (pigs), regardless of demand, determined supply. Everyone was forced to work, so there was no competition for jobs. The true costs of production were not known. Wages were completely arbitrary, as were prices of goods. Animalism was created to represent communism, and it succeeded well. Snowball represents Leon Trotsky from World War One. Snowball was young, smart, and a very good speaker. He was idealistic, and he wanted to make life for all animals easier and happier. Leon Trotsky also wanted to improve the life for all Russian people. For most of his life Leon Trotsky was a man without a country, banished from one land to another. He was exiled from many different countries. He organized the famous Red Army. Snowball was the plotter for the Battle of the Cowshed. Trotsky and Joseph Stalin struggled for leadership, as did Snowball and Napoleon. Snowball was chased away by Napoleons dogs. Trotsky was chased away by Lenins secret police (KGB). George Orwell had a great talent in creating such a character as Snowball to symbolize Leon Trotsky. As for Napoleon, he represented Joseph Stalin. Napoleon was not a good speaker, and was not as clever as Snowball was. He was cruel, brutal, selfish, devious, and corrupt. His ambition was for power. He used dogs, Moses, and Squealer to keep the animals in control. Joseph Stalin was also not a good speaker, and was not as educated like Trotsky. He and Napoleon did not follow Marxs ideas. He cared for power, and killed all that opposed him. He used KGB, allowed church, and propagandized. Stalin was probably the most ruthless and successful tyrant the world has known. Napoleon was also very cruel to the other animals. He created in the Soviet Union a totalitarian state in which the government controlled everythingall agriculture, all industry, the arts and sciences, sports, entertainment, the media, and religion, as did Napoleon to Animal Farm. To make sure that his commands were obeyed and that no one disagreed with him, Stalin employed a vast network of secret police. Napoleon had guard dogs around him to make sure the animals obeyed him at all times. The victims of his campaigns of political terror included some of his followers. Stalin exiled Trotsky from the Soviet Union in 1929 and had him assassinated in Mexico in 1940. Napoleon had his guard dogs chase off Snowball. Having dealt with the opposition Stalin, as well as Napoleon, was then supreme ruler. In a drive to industrialize and modernize the Soviet Union, he launched the first in a series of five-year plans in 1928. He declared, We are 50 to 100 years behind advanced countries. READ: Cotton Industry EssayWe must cover this distance in 10 years. Napoleon continued with Snowballs original plans to build the Windmill. Stalin ordered the collectivization of farms. When peasants resisted, he ordered the state to seize their land and possessions. Well-to-do farmers, called kulaks, especially resented collectivization. Determined to root out all opposition, Stalin showed no mercy to the rebellious kulaks. In 1932-33, he created a famine in Ukraine and liquidated some 3 million kulaks through death by starvation. Napoleon also created starvation by not feeding the other animals for everyday meals. Stalin, Claiming that a number of Red Army officers and scores of old Bolsheviks were plotting against the state, Stalin had them executed. Napoleon had animals killed that admitted to plotting against him. Once again, George Orwell created an almost exact duplicate of World War One legends. George Orwell surely created this book as an allegory, because of all the symbolism that was in this novel. Symbolism is a main quality of this book, and without one knowing the history of World War One, the book would just seem nothing more than a group of animals that talk and sing.

Thursday, February 13, 2020

Aspects of Connected Speech - part 2 . research Thesis

Aspects of Connected Speech - part 2 . research - Thesis Example w?l] (ii) ‘No. I don’t think I will.’ Daniel: [w?l l l?s?n dn liv ?m ma? b?laf] (iii) ‘Well! Listen. Don’t leave on my behalf.’ [a? k? ?tz? ?ba?t? a?m ju? ?n? a? p s pas b?ha?nd ?s dn? ju das] (iv) ‘I think its about time you and I put this past behind us - don’t you Darc?’ [ lis? ste? f r? ?bde? drk w mi? j? ?m br h?] (v) ‘At least stay for a birthday drink with me and Bridg huh.’ Mark: [ba? brt] (vi) ‘Bye bridget’ Bridget: [mak] (vii) ‘Mark’ [wa? r ? ju h] (viii) ‘Why are you here?’ Daniel: [br a? s t?l? u wa j? a?m h] (ix) ‘Bridg I just told you why I’m here.’ [wa? w?z ma? wk? dasi h] (x) ‘Why was Mark wanker Darcy here?’ [ bl?di h?l we ? m?n?t hiz b?k] (xi) ‘Oh! Bloody hell! Wait a minute. He’s back.’ Mark: [?lra kliv r ? a?tsa?d] (xii) ‘Alright Cleaver, outside.’ Daniel: [a?m s?ri] (xiii) ‘Iâ€⠄¢m sorry?’ Mark: [a?tsa?d] (xiv) ‘Outside!’ Daniel: [d a? br ma? ?jul?m p?st?lz ? ma? s?d] (xv) ‘Should I bring my dualing pistols or my sword?’ [?lra h?l] (xvi) ‘Alright. ... The adjustment of the final nasal /n/ in ‘on’ to the bilabial articulation of /m/ in ‘my’ [?m ma?] in line (iii) is an instance of phonemic assimilation; the phoneme /n/ becomes the phoneme /m/ and thus shares the same attributes or features as the bilabial articulation of /m/. In this case, there is a single articulation of /m/ but it is lengthened in accordance with the final /m/ of the modified ‘on’ and the following initial /m/ of ‘my’. If the sound was not lengthened it would be heard as [?m a?], which is not considered natural to a native speaker of English. In line (v) we find another such assimilation with the words ‘and Bridg’, in which case the /d/ of ‘and’ is first dropped and the alveolar nasal /n/ assimilates with the following bilabial stop /b/; thus we find [?m br] instead of [?n br]. Similarly, phonemic assimilation is apparent in line (xv), which shows the final phoneme velar nasal /?/ in à ¢â‚¬Ëœdueling’ changing to the bilabial articulation of the initial bilabial /p/ in ‘pistols’ [?jul?m p?st?lz]; the nasal /?/ therefore shares the same attributes as the bilabial articulation of /p/. In line (ix) [t?l? u] we find further evidence of assimilation; this time however, it is likely the final alveolar /d/ of ‘told’ has assimilated in anticipation of the word initial palatal approximant /j/ of ‘you’ but because ‘you’ is unstressed the phonemes /d/ and /j/ have combined (coalesced) to arrive at [t?l? u]. This would be unlikely to happen if the word ‘you’ was stressed, wherein we would probably hear [t?l? ju]. In line (xv) we find further evidence of coalescent assimilation but this time within a word rather than across

Saturday, February 1, 2020

Screening Medical Disorders Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Screening Medical Disorders - Essay Example Correspondingly, the data collected also provided idea that a considerable number of people need support during post-treatment phase owing to certain difficulties that are likely to arise. These types of criticalities have certain impacts on the patients that include both physical as well as psychological complications. Therefore, therapists aligned with providing effective care play a significant role to undertake these decisions during such emergency associated with surgeries or other critical diseases. Additionally, the physical therapists must possess adequate knowledge for providing proper medical treatment. Adequate knowledge about providing primary care enables the therapists to take proper care of the patients and assists them in recovering from their ailments. However, if the physical therapists lack technical knowledge regarding the surgical process or treating patients suffering from critical diseases then it is most likely that the patients are provided with a vague or im proper treatment. This might also add up to further deterioration of health and can lead to loss of life (Boissonnault, 2010; Fair, 2010). Additionally, the patients who have participated in the survey have considerable knowledge regarding surgery and other diseases that they are suffering. This further reflects that the primary care therapists taking care of the same are playing an effective role towards educating the patients about the diseases and providing knowledge about the probable treatments.